Short answer. Islam permits a man up to four wives — but only under a demand for justice so exacting that the Quran itself calls perfect equality between wives impossible. In practice monogamy is, and has long been, the overwhelming norm among Muslims. The verse did not launch polygamy; it regulated and hemmed in a practice the ancient world already took for granted.
The objection, stated fairly
To modern ears the permission sounds indefensible: a religion that lets a man take up to four wives seems to license inequality and treat women as interchangeable. Stated at its strongest, the objection is that polygamy is inherently unjust to women, and that a faith permitting it cannot claim to honor them. That deserves a real answer — not a dismissal, and not a defensive shrug — and the answer begins with reading what the Quran actually says, in full, rather than the half-verse that usually gets quoted.
What the Quran actually says
The permission appears once, in a single verse, and it does not stand alone — it is wrapped in conditions from its first word to its last:
"And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice]."
— Quran 4:3 (Saheeh International)1
Notice what the verse is doing. It opens by worrying about orphan girls — and according to the classical commentators, that is precisely its setting. Ibn Kathir explains, on the authority of Aisha, that the verse addresses guardians who held orphan girls in their care and might exploit them: a guardian tempted by a ward's wealth or beauty to marry her without a fair dowry is told instead to marry other women, and to do so justly.3 The permission of plural marriage arrives, in other words, as part of a rule protecting vulnerable women — orphans and, in the wider surah revealed to a community left with many widows and orphans, those with no one to support them. And it closes by pulling in the opposite direction from license: if you fear you cannot be just, marry only one. The default the verse itself recommends, the moment justice is in doubt, is a single wife.
Then, a hundred-odd verses later, the same chapter removes almost all remaining room:
"And you will never be able to be equal [in feeling] between wives, even if you should strive [to do so]. So do not incline completely [toward one] and leave another hanging..."
— Quran 4:129 (Saheeh International)2
Read together, the two verses are remarkable. One makes polygamy conditional on perfect justice; the other states outright that perfect justice between wives is beyond human reach. This is why mainstream scholars — and reference works on women in Islam — read the Quran as regulating and discouraging polygamy rather than promoting it: the permission is real, but the bar set on it is deliberately, almost prohibitively, high.563
Monogamy is the norm — and always has been
The rhetoric around Muslim polygamy tends to obscure a simple demographic fact: the overwhelming majority of Muslim marriages, then and now, are monogamous. Globally, only about 2% of people live in polygamous households, and in Muslim-majority countries such as Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh, fewer than 1% of Muslim men live with more than one wife.4 Where polygamy is genuinely common — a cluster of countries in West and Central Africa — the pattern tracks regional custom rather than Islam as such; many of those societies are only partly Muslim, and many heavily Muslim countries show rates near zero.4 The lived reality across the Muslim world is monogamy, with plural marriage a rare exception.456
Conditions and the rights of the wives
Because the permission is conditional, classical and modern law surround it with protections rather than leaving it to a husband's whim. A man is limited to a maximum of four wives, and only on the condition — restated by reference works on women in Islam — that he treat them equitably.5 Justice here is concrete, not sentimental: it obliges materially equal provision — housing, maintenance, and an even division of time and attention among the wives.56 A wife's consent to the marriage is required as in any Islamic marriage, and in much Muslim family law a woman may stipulate monogamy as a binding condition in her own marriage contract, so that a husband who later takes a second wife breaks the contract itself.6 Many Muslim-majority states have gone further, adding judicial permission or the first wife's knowledge as legal requirements.5
Comparative honesty
It is worth being plain about one more thing, without scoring points: polygamy is not a Muslim peculiarity but a feature of the ancient Near Eastern world Islam emerged from — and of the biblical tradition in particular. The Hebrew Bible permits and regulates plural marriage, and its revered patriarchs and kings practiced it: Abraham took Hagar alongside Sarah, Jacob married Leah and Rachel, and Kings David and Solomon had many wives.7 The point is not "they did it too." It is that plural marriage was the near-universal background practice of the entire region, in Jewish and Arabian society alike, long before the Quran addressed it.756
In short
Against that background, what the Quran did was not to introduce polygamy but to cap and condition an unbounded existing custom — limiting it to four, binding it to a standard of justice it then declared humanly impossible to meet perfectly, and steering the doubtful case back toward a single wife. The result, in the lived experience of the Muslim world, is that monogamy is the norm and polygamy the tightly-hedged exception. To learn more about how Islam frames the standing and rights of women, see Women in Islam and Does Islam oppress women?.